Replies

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

THIS IS AN UPDATED POST, THE ORIGINAL POST IS AT THE BOTTOM UNDER THE CUT

I've been mulling on this since we got the 'Other' option for the user profile. Before that came along if you felt uncomfortable at having to choose male or female on your profile, you just didn't choose. I didn't like either label, so I didn't choose a label. But having the 'Other' option was undoubtedly an improvement- I had a label that fit, and being able to have one rather than just not choosing. That felt nice.

For me, personally, I can fit this onto the idea that I'd like this option for pet creation- you can choose 'Other' from the get-go. Right now you don't even get to leave your pet's gender blank, you have to pick between one of two genders.

There's the genderless berry, of course. So as it stands, your pet can be male, female- and if not then it has no gender at all. And there's a big, big spectrum outside of that. In a way the 'Genderless' option is similar to the blank space on the user profile before the 'Other' option was added- except you need to pay for it, it doesn't come automatically. You can't even pay for it at pet creation, you need to adopt a gendered pet first before obtaining the Berry.

what I'd love is a non-binary option that is just non-binary: the 'Other' option that can cover everything outside of a gender binary. also I'd quite like it to be free.

OR, SIMPLIFIED

one. currently, the genderless berry is your only option for a non-binary pet
Genderless or being agender falls under the non-binary umbrella. There's genderfluid, intergender, everything that you can't label so you call yourself non-binary because you don't fit the male/female binary. So if we have genderless as an option, it definitely would make sense for us to non-binary as well- we have one of the things that fall under the NB umbrella, why not have the NB label represented entirely :D.

two. you need to pay for your only non-binary option
Disregarding all else, even being Genderless doesn't come at pet creation, you need to pay for it. Attainability therefore isn't the issue- the Genderless Berry is in unlimited stock and available for subeta points, therefore obtainable by any user. At maximum, it's three days of questing for a non-gold account user. But it feels odd to have to pay for that option, because you only get the one option for having a non-binary pet. I guess that if a non-binary option is ever introduced, it should be there from the beginning, a choice at pet creation.

If a non-binary option was added, then honestly it might make sense lorewise for the Berry to cost money. I think what I mean to say is that right now, it's the only option we're given for a non-binary pet of any sort, and we need to obtain it through a paid item.

related things
GENDERFLUID BERRY SUGGESTION THREAD. a thread advocating for a genderfluid berry

pet icons!! whispers yikes is there a thread on this i can link here.

[center ORIGINAL POST UNDER THE CUT[/center]]

So I know we have the Genderless Berry- but aside from having to purchase it, it just removes the gender of your pet.

recently let you choose 'other' for your gender on the user profile, and it really got me thinking- especially when I was creating a pet the other day and was rather jarred by the male/female option for some reason :s. It hadn't happened before, but then again we hadn't had the 'other' option in the user profile before lmao. It's been nagging in my mind since then and I've become progressively uncomfortable with the Genderless Berry ahah.

I'd just really like to be able to have a non-binary pet without needing it be genderless, and to be able to choose that option from adoption.

Anticipating response, I don't think that the existence of the Genderless Berry should be any kind of detriment to this happening? The value of the Berry is non-consequential (it's obtainable via sP and is unlimited in number- compounded to the fact it should be 3 days of questing at max). But the fact you need to buy your only option for a non-binary pet feels a little odd.

That's not really the main issue of my vague discomfort though: right now your pet can be male or female, or otherwise it has no gender at all.

And I guess there's just a big big space outside of all that. It wasn't created to be anything problematic, and it isn't- but we have better for the user profile now, maybe we can do the same for pets?

Lmao I guess the bottom line is, we have 'Other' for the user profile (and I can make various comparisons because you could leave that section blank before, which is what I was doing before the 'Other' came around)- the Genderless Berry feels like that empty space for me, except you need to buy it. I'd just like to have that 'Other' option for your pet as well :'). This turned into a little bit of a rant haha.

[edit] Okay just had a realization and decided to put it in the main post so ppl don't have to scroll: Genderless/agender falls under the NB umbrella, so I mean, more reason to support having the NB option from the get-go! Having genderless as an option without having the NB option is defo slightly odd.

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Bug
User Avatar
Segfault

Quote by Akito
But the fact you need to buy your only option for a non-binary pet feels a little odd.

The last time I brought this up, I got shot down pretty quickly by other users, so good luck.

🐝 ☕ bug (he/him) | your friendly neighborhood code wrangler. stay in the loop! join and check out the latest admin post highlights

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

D:

Oh man, ;-;. Ty lmao. Also wait just realized I pinged you instead of like, the other thing subeta lets you do (does that actually make a difference do you get a notice anyway lmao).

edit: i should actually probably ping you in this lmao!

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Bug
User Avatar
Segfault

No, only pings will send notifications. What you wanted to do was use the user sCode, like this:

That'll just make a hoverable username thingy but it won't ping the user c: This is off topic though so I'll leave it at that, check out the sCode reference for more stuff like this.

[edit] FWIW I'm in support of having three gender options on the pet creation screen (Male, Female, Genderless) so that you don't have to pay to have a genderless pet in the first place, you just have to pay if you want to change it. I'm also in support of adding another gender option that isn't Genderless but just "Nonbinary" (as an umbrella term) or something like that.

Just a reminder, I'm not in charge of these decisions here, I'm just a coder and not involved with content.

🐝 ☕ bug (he/him) | your friendly neighborhood code wrangler. stay in the loop! join and check out the latest admin post highlights

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Avel
has ALL of the plushies!
User Avatar
NVLB

I mean, I wouldn't use it but it wouldn't hurt my experience here. However, I do agree that if the option comes up, it should be from the get-go. The berry already feels weird to me in that you have to work for a blank slate pet which is... eh? If you want to change it, then sure, that's up to you but right now, you don't even get a choice in the matter.

[tot=Avel]

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

Ohh ty! And !! Yess same big mood . Honestly I don't mind the Genderless option being only purchasable (although actually maybe I do since steamwork pets or whatever get it automatically but I haven't noticed it much so I can't say anything there Yikes)- but definitely I think that a non-binary option should be separate from simply being 'Genderless'. (i mean nb is an umbrella term containing agender too, i mean err man im making a mess of this reply im on mobile and have no spirit in me to edit this to sound coherent) (but! the fact we get agender and not the broader nb option makes me feel like we ought to get nb as an option from the start lmao).

!! also ayy i getcha lmao wheezes i also just started going through the forum and finding other similar-ish posts in the past ahh i see what you meant now by getting shot down lmao :s

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago Official
Kevin
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Wuf

If you want to support genderless on pet creation, a thread for that exists here

Since this one is suggesting something slightly different, I'll leave it open.

There is a suggestion for a genderfluid berry, which I can find and link if anyone would like to post support for it

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
jensen
rolled snake eyes
User Avatar
RM

full support. i like options. this is beside the point, but personally i think the only one that should be locked-in as your first choice/locked behind a paywall is the steamwork gear icon.

(and... this isn't entirely related, but if it was possible, i'd advocate for no icon being a legitimate option too. i really like halidom being without an icon, and wish i could have more than one like it.)

oh sacred spork, smite mine enemies

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Kevin
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Wuf

You may be interested in this thread :)

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ryuu
is all-powerful
User Avatar
DarkRyuu

Pets can also be and, if I'm remembering correctly, a few of the first created zentu came with no 'gender' image at all. special pets

Anyway, I'd be for this being changed/added to when a pet is made! :D If we have the option to make the pet that later, why not when it is made to begin with, since it's gender?

And, I kind of like the berry being called genderless, but I also see why you'd want it to be something else, or maybe even a different one altogether? [sub](then again, this come from someone who's been pretty fond of 'neuter' so i'm probably terrible to be weighing in)[/sub]

[edit]wow, this thread is busy. there was, like, a couple of posts when I started typing this. haha.

[sub]:dmg:dark:[/sub]

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

Ohh, yes please !! :o I'd love to see that thread tbh (honestly you can probably tell I don't come on the forums much any more lmao) (1000% support for genderfluid berry lmao)

And yep!! I think I'm campaigning for something different certainly- genderfluid and agender fall inside the non-binary umbrella, so I guess having those (and hopefully genderfluid berry in the future), makes me want the umbrella term even more?

Lmao I imagine that you mean it wouldn't hurt your experience here, and I agree completely !!

o.o ohh man i'm bad with terminologies, 'no icon'? (//wheezes what are icons again oh man) (i........ don't work on my pets often either >.>)

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Avel
has ALL of the plushies!
User Avatar
NVLB

I did. Thanks for pointing that out, I edited it before anyone got the wrong idea. D:

[tot=Avel]

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago Official
Kevin
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Wuf

Genderfluid berry thread is here :)

I'll put it in a purple header so it stands out too

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

Ohh yep!! What I'm sorta trying to say is that the Genderless Berry doesn't need to be changed for me? Having an option for a Genderless pet is good.

But being able to have a non-binary pet from the get-go seems like a good idea too since being Genderless falls inside the non-binary umbrella. I mean like aside from agender you can be genderfluid or just identify as non-binary if you don't really have any other labels for yourself- so having the NB option from initial adoption is something I really get behind ayy!

(also same i posted a reply just now and there was another reply above mine that hadn't been there when i started writing that reply) (lmao!) (wait does that sentence sound coherent oh man) (wheezes) (//hands u cookies i'm so incoherent i'm sorry friend)

wheezes awesome tysm @

lmao !! big mood ahhhhh it's really the principle that feels wrong to me, having to pay for it, and having that as your only option? :s

edit: by principle i mean sorta that, the actual cost of the berry isn't high and it's very obtainable, but the fact that it's something you need to buy?? rather than something that comes as an option. if there were other NB options i could see why you might pay for your pet to be genderless, it kind-of makes sense lorewise, but as the only NB option right now it doesn't feel very right.

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
jensen
rolled snake eyes
User Avatar
RM

!!! i'm gonna post on that so fast omg thank you

halidom was one of the very first zentu who, like mentioned, had no gender specified when they were created (even though people were specifically going for male/female ones in the pool and all). so instead of halidom the (gender icon) common experiment 870, i just have halidom the common experiment 870, with no icon or extra space c: i think most of the glitched zentu were fixed early on so they're hard to find now -- mine was very lucky pound find.

oh sacred spork, smite mine enemies

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Avel
has ALL of the plushies!
User Avatar
NVLB

It irks me too, and I have no need for it. If that's all people get as a choice, then the paywall is just unfortunate, but it's more unfortunate for the people who already paid because that's all they had.

[tot=Avel]

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Ark
has seen too much
User Avatar
Mr. World

Ohhh man I see !! That makes sense- I actually had to er. Look on other threads and only now. Like. 4 years in to subeta, do I realize that icons in pet names are a thing.

Oh man. //wheezes

I'm dying this is like. How have I never noticed. I mean I guess I just always saw and never noticed what am I doing with life. I just went on the main news page and navigated through a week's worth of spotlight pets and???? LMAO!!

But !! Halidom is awesome cool O____O. Thaz amazin'. XD Same I'd just. I really like the no-icon idea actually. Having it be a legitimate thing sounds... really nice. O_O (do genderless berry pets have an icon ahh) (oh man i'm so ignorant) (Yikes) (ty friend u have educated me so much in the past 10 minutes lmao)

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
jensen
rolled snake eyes
User Avatar
RM

they can be easy to miss since they're so small and people seem to write the word out for custom profiles, i think :? i skim over/ignore it about half the time i look at pet profiles, it seems ;>>

there's only four icons right now, male, female, a little grey circle for genderless, and steamwork gear for steamwork pets that are built (and if you change the color of a steamwork gear pet, i think it becomes the genderless circle?)... which is cool and all but a little restrictive and i just. really like options so i hope yours' and the other suggestions get more support ;w;

oh sacred spork, smite mine enemies

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Spice
User Avatar

Genderless pets (non-steamwork) have a little next to their name instead of the male or female symbol.

I think an NB option at pet creation would be pretty cool, maybe make the symbol like a little rainbow or something.

Aug 22, 2017 8 years ago
Avel
has ALL of the plushies!
User Avatar
NVLB

Does NB have its own flag? Those colours would be more appropriate than just a regular rainbow (it's too broad).

[tot=Avel]

Please log in to reply to this topic.