December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by sikkykins
Avatar Border
User Avatar

drama, drama, drama....

goes and plays with a hoop and a stick out back

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Friskysquirt
User Avatar

Been avoiding the topic, but I just read the story. I liked it and thought it was well written. Good graphic imagery.

I won't say anymore as I will get pissed off with people and wouldn't like to criticise other pets, Squeak.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Venom
Avatar Border
User Avatar

So we are gonna bitch about everything are we? Well, the next pretty pet that involves loving cupcakes and rainbows will make me want to vomit and I will bitch about it then. The story wasn't bad, people just enjoy different things. There are nicer ways to get your opinion across... there was a warning afterall. If it isn't your cup of tea, Jeebus forbid. I enjoyed it, good job Hearse.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by TsunTsunDere
User Avatar

Quote By "LotusTwister":

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">It's nekid time! ;D

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by TsunTsunDere
User Avatar

Did the staff...ignore this? Normally I see at least one response by a staff member when people start bitching over a news post. Ah fuck, I can't believe you've done this. B|

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by BlueDragonfly
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Okay... i can take a lot of ugly things (I read the high octane nightmare fuel pages on tvtropes for cryin' out loud) but that...was jsut ugh, that story...ugh ...urk

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Mudkip
User Avatar

I liked him better when he was nekkid...

The story was terrible and made me want to barf...I don't care if it had a warning or not the story was bad

I'm gonna go find some sprite to see if that helps my stomach...

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Alaska
User Avatar

well, there IS a warning so. in any case, i'm glad they got the story up.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by OnyxKiaraRose
User Avatar

The story in itself is badly written. I am disgusted that the staff chose it due to the story that said person tried to tell. It is offensive to many and sickening to others with weak stomachs. To many variables makes it a loose cannon.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by NIKKI
User Avatar

there is a rule already. Quote:

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">Do Not Claim Others' Pets As Your Own The use of 'fake pets' on user/pet profiles, whether you state that they are fake or not, is not allowed. This means that you cannot display pets that are NOT owned by you on-site and/or claim ownership of a pet that you don't actually own.

Looks like Hearse took down Mael's button sometime today.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Sasuke
User Avatar

story's wicked good though gender is switched at times. That is much better than when was nothing there.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by peacock
User Avatar

EVERYBODY.

chill out.

I know hearse personally, and honestly, it was a mistake, as i know he had something up at one point. as it got transferred it probably was removed for whatever reason.

is it unfortunate? yes. does it deserve a repick? Maybe, but since it has all the info up now, why does it matter?

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by rhino_loupe
User Avatar

Quote:

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">What this REALLY proves is how many people look at the pet spotlight !! YAY!
Yes indeed

Glad to see it has a story now, a very good one. But all this drama llama bsns was not needed.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Kakashi
User Avatar

At least there's a story now.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Lantern
Avatar Border
User Avatar

I kinda knew they wouldn't repick Oh well.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by BlackGemini
User Avatar

I have a feeling that there won't be a repick today. :%Pr

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by heARSE
Avatar Border
User Avatar

There. His two stories are up. He has a plain profile. Now at least if you don't like him, you can complain about HIM and not his lack-of-(insert here).

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Addi
Avatar Border
User Avatar

If they can re-pick, they should.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by PiranhaPettingZoo
User Avatar

buuh... buh theres no profile??! I dont... I dont understands! I'm confused and.. and angry! Aaaauueeerrgh! Hurrrrrrrrgh!

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by heARSE
Avatar Border
User Avatar

I honestly don't see why Mael won. The only profile he ever had up was Siren's, and that was for an application. I vote for a re-pick, please. Mael really doesn't deserve to win this.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Corgi
User Avatar

This hasn't been fixed yet? :/

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Blastoise
User Avatar

Woah!? I can't see the profile or anything O.o everything is missing!? what happened?

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Megan_799
User Avatar

I'm wondering if there's going to be any sort of rule about listing a pet on your profile that isnt in your account now.

Eagerly awaiting the redraw here!

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Ryan
User Avatar

Giving Nightmare Irions a bad name since 4/28/10

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Acute
User Avatar

It's nekid time! ;D

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by TsunTsunDere
User Avatar

I...I didnt even click on the pet, and thought something was weird. I guess Im wrong, but...I thought Mael had won before. I guess I`ve just seen the pet before. o__o;;

Shame this happens...I still have my fingers crossed for Sir Arthur...

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Paint
User Avatar

I'd really love to see a staff post explaining why there wasn't a repick, either here or in site feedback.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Link_274
User Avatar

Ah... I guess I should have read /why/ first.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Link_274
User Avatar

Alright... O.o That was definitely not a deserved winner. Terrible! I see no story or profile.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Peach
User Avatar

Quote:

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">Loool, I would have never known there wasn't a profile since I never look at the winning pets, but the comments made me have to look.
Same xD It's kind of sad that I had a feeling that the number of comments wasn't because the pet was super awesome, but because I knew there was probably something wrong with it.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Lai
User Avatar

Sorry for the blank comment. But people have to understand why some people are upset with this. We understand it is not the staffs fault really, but still it is upsetting when there are those of us who really worked hard on our own pets and have been waiting every day to see if we might win. So when something like this happens, I feel that we are allowed to express our disappointment. Doesn't mean I am pissed at the staff, just that I hope they fix it soon.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Lai
User Avatar
December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Malefik669
User Avatar

wtf is going here Oo

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Zevran
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Oh snap! Looks like the world is going to end. A nekkid pet has won teh spotlight. Whatever will we do?

Is this the first time this has happened? I think so. Mistakes happen, random pick is random. But people need to lighten up a little bit. The staff will probably make some change to how it works so only the pretty pets win.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Alaska
User Avatar

lol, that's a shame. xD

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by ARU
User Avatar

Heaven forbid a blank page win anything! Excuse me while I go remove one of my pets from the queue because his background is all icky and white.

Don't get so worked up, guys. All pets featured on the news page don't show pretty overlays, so if you don't click his name you won't have to endure the awfulness of seeing nothing there.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Cass
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Quote By oddishness:

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">moral of the story: actually buy the pet slots you claim to buy instead of shuffling pets constantly.

Pretty much sums up what I was thinking x:

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by JoAnna_119
User Avatar

Once pets get accepted into the queue they are not re-checked. There is far too many pets. There is a disable button that will allow the owner to take off the nomination. The owner should have done this especially since they temporarily adopted it out. It is not staff's fault.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Slavic
User Avatar

It says on the page, "Adopted: April 20th, 2010", so it must have been nominated before that..

Holy crap, the pets really aren't checked often are they? xD

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Saturnine
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Quote:

; border: 1px solid ; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10;">I happen to think it's incredibly depressing that this is the spotlight with the most comments. lol

-Agrees-

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Urocyon
User Avatar

Lol, you guys are getting just as pissy yelling at the people who were originally getting pissy. XD EVERYONE JUST CALM DOWN. <3 How sad for Hearse though, that this pet wins when he's not all dolled up. : <

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by OFF_372
User Avatar

Huh. I guess Subeta just wasn't expecting something like this happening. In any case, the profile must have been something lovely to have been accepted. Hopefully it will be put back up soon.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Barbie
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Loool, I would have never known there wasn't a profile since I never look at the winning pets, but the comments made me have to look.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Paws
User Avatar

Really, you guys are pissed off? .. Mael probably was chosen before he was transferred.. The owner had no idea they were going to win before transferring. It's one day and a mistake. It'll get fixed now that they know what's up. Grooooosfraaabaaaa.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Memorv
Avatar Border
User Avatar

Humm...

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by god
Avatar Border
User Avatar

We have an entire day to look at the news and see a blank pet win the spotlight. The world is going to end.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by SilvyrWing
User Avatar

If you want to see some neat profiles, just head to heARSE's other pets. I'm sure this one was similar when it was up. No big.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Grove
User Avatar

Dear people of the world, not everything on Subeta is perfect. Many big things have gone wrong, the Pet Spotlight is not one of these. Sure it's disappointing, but hey it's just a spotlight for only -one- day.

Considering the fact that a pet is very likely to be a permanent pet if it has a profile and everything this scenario is rather unforeseeable.

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Nellerz
User Avatar

Ummm why?

December 31, 1969, 7:00 pm by Lovespell
Avatar Border
User Avatar

"I happen to think it's incredibly depressing that this is the spotlight with the most comments. lol"

Seconding icarus

Leave a Comment

Use @username to mention someone. Supports markdown formatting.