Not only do I get two of one item in BOTH shops (I know, threads a dozen about that) but I noticed as I was accepting a long list of dance requests after logging back on, I am not accepting them one by one either. I click on the event notice, I am brought to the accept screen with one user, and then when I click 'accept', it shows a different user, the next in the list.

I SINCERELY hope that it is double accepting because if it is actually just eating my requests...I've already had too many tokens eaten by the first glitch I've mentioned.

I noticed that too, I hope these bugs will be fixed ASAP!!

I am so super glad I'm not the only one.

I was noticing this, too. Only for me, when I clicked to accept a particular user, it shows a random user from the list as giving me tokens. I can get through all the dances just fine, just not in the proper order. And I do start from the first dance request to the latest, so I know it's not just kicking me back to the first request.

That might be it...I had so many dance invitations that one time that I didn't want to try and keep track of them all, just a few when I noticed it...so I didn't follow the weirdness very carefully.

Yeah, it can get overwhelming, especially when it just starts acting abnormally with no prior indication. As far as I can tell, it didn't skip or "eat" any dances for me. I would click on a specific person, have another person show up at the "accept/deny" page, and then I think receive tokens from either that person or another random one from the list--though I honestly can't remember at this point. It does seem to be working all right for me now, though that may be due to me getting only one or two dances at the moment. If the dance requests are left overnight/for a longer time, that's when this problem seems to surface.

I just accepted out of three and it did the mixing around thing...so maybe not. But you are right, it does seem to just be mixing the list, not losing it.

Ah, that's good. I mean, still a bit of a pain that it's not accepting them in order, but at least none are lost. I admit, I panicked a bit when I thought I was losing dances! I'm wondering if it has something to do with the caching system (or however it works) of the events. I've noticed if an event pops up within the last hour, it automatically lists it as received "an hour ago" even when it's much sooner than that. So, I'm wondering if it's not simply sorting them out of order, or if it is a glitch with the dances. Either way, good to hear it isn't "eating" dances.

Yeah, it seems like it's just getting them out of order.

I think it can mainly be incredibly confusing at first glance. And while it's not a huge issue, I do hope it gets fixed (if it hasn't already).

Agreed.I'm just relieved to know I didn't lose any dances :)

Same here! :)

I got 2 invites today and I'm sure I didn't accept them before, and when I clicked to accept I only got to dance with 1 of the 2 people... isn't it a glitch?

@ofelia

I would assume so :/

I knew I couldn't be the only one. I usually don't get more than one invite at a time (like once I go offline I don't come back to a bunch of them), but I have noticed some repeating. My request will show one name, the accept/reject page will show a different user from a previous dance, and it's sort of hit or miss which one I get when I hit accept. Sometimes it's the user from the request, sometimes it's the user from before. It's not every single dance, if memory serves, but it's happening more and more often.

It's become super random for me now. Sometimes, it'll just accept whoever I was accepting, sometimes it'll screw the order around. Sometimes it helps if I accept one, hit refresh (accepting another), and then try accepting and denying one by one. Sometimes.

Yeah, it's really going haywire. After I posted here, I went to accept a request I'd received. I can't remember the order they came in, but it was really screwy... I kept clicking the event to see what would come up and took four or five of that to get to the user who'd actually made the request.

That sounds par for the course :/

@ofelia Please refer to this thread: lock.

Thanks! :)