This is a site built on the backs of artists. AI steals from artists. I rest my case.

What prompted this? o_O But yeah, fuck AI.

It's already the case.

Tbh, it could use that phrasing of "AI or AI learning" so you can smack anyone who says that wasn't there with a wet tuna...

Can you clarify what Subeta views as stealing when it comes to AI? Is it removing watermarks? Not listing a source? Or is any use of it banned entirely, even if you're not claiming or attempting to redistribute it?

I whole-heartedly agree with the sentiment of the board, but I'm confused by the wording of the rule vs the responses here.

Best to avoid AI images like the plague for using them as inspiration for Subeta artwork etc. in case other countries follow China's decision.

Article dated March 21, 2025 Another Chinese court finds that AI-generated images can be protected by copyright: the Changshu People’s Court and the ‘half heart’ case

I seen some here >__>