Would it be possible to have an option to order the list of items we are still missing in our collections (plushies, books, beanbags etc.) from cheapest to most expensive according to user shop price, like we can do with wishlists?

It would be such a blessing! Right now I use Subetalodge for that exact same function (which is really awesome and helps a lot!), but the items aren't updated automatically and doing it manually can be a pain.

I really hope this can be considered, I'd spend a lot more sP into all my collections, it would make life so much easier!

[sorry if this was already suggested, couldn't find anything recent myself]

Have you seen this page on SubetaLodge? It makes updating your collection a little easier -- not quite automatic, but with some machine assistance. You view your pet's book list on this site, view the source code (this is an option in most browsers), then copy and paste the source code into SubetaLodge. We'll scan what you've pasted for any books that aren't already in your pet's collection and add them.

I hope this helps.

Thanks, I am aware of that function

You can make a wishlist of the missing items and then sort in the WL by user price.

full support for this!

that honestly seems like it would be more strain on the server than simply having a toggle option on the collection page itself

Why do you think? I would think since it is not checking for completion it would be less straining. And then when you purchase the books you just remove the wl border which updates the WL. For the collections page it has to recheck all the books.

I really don't feel like adding 14 pages of books to my wishlist. And then doing the same for all collections all over again. I can see it being an alternative but it's really not a good one and doesn't really solve the problem I'm trying to tackle here.

why would it not just run on a cached version of the collection when it swaps between A-Z & User Price? there's no reason it would need to recheck every single book every time you switch between the two of them, especially if there's a disclaimer at the top.

on top of that, let's say I have a single Gourmand pet and a single battle pet I read books to. the "foods eaten" incomplete collection is 56 pages for 10039 foods (and growing every month). the "books read" incomplete collection page is 16 pages for 2777 books (also grows every month). what you're proposing is an astronomical amount of work for a new player, and a hefty amount of work for a player who's already put some work into each respective collection.

it also doesn't solve the issue if there is more than one gourmand/battler, since you'd still end up using off-site resources to figure out which pets have read which books since removing something from the WL on site removes it from all wishlists (meaning you have to then go back and re-add a book/food to each secondary pet's wishlist).

If it was cached then I don't see an issue. Just how to currently is, it seems to reevaluate and at least for books tied to how the high score table updates. As someone who has the one reader for books this was the work around I did and had the 12 pages worth of items at the time added. It for sure is a pain. Yeah just was offering an alternative workaround which is what I did with Permanent.

If this wouldn't be too hard to implement or a strain on the servers, full support! I use wishlists and SubetaLodge for this function but this suggestion would make it so much easier.

Id like this because its hard to show anyone your wishlist for a pet unless you literally make a separate list just for them, and then the user cant really search your subetalodge by cheapest to most expensive (say someone wanted to buy tyger a book for fun, they would not have a good way to find the cheapest he hasnt read...)

supports I was thinking about this the other day while searching for books. ;(

@/Dude (oop sorry didn't mean to tag you)

full support, that would be SO useful

(especially when your collections get big it's a bit of a strain to manually keep up with that you've collected on subetalodge)

i would love this... it takes sooo long to manually go through the entire items missing list and shop search each item. trying to see if something is affordable currently. i don't use a wishlist for stuff like this because my wishlist is already stupidly large. and there's already a list the site makes itself so it feels silly and redundant. though it is the only "simple" way to do it atm.

i guess it isn't an option already because it would be too much strain. (though i thought i read before large wishlists were a strain as well? oops.) idk. i don't know about that stuff! -_-

I would also love this as an option. Perhaps if it was GA only, or if it was limited to a few times a day, to lower strain on Subeta.