In Wardrobe 3.5, once you select around 10 items, the items that you add from then on start popping up in the middle of the layered list instead of at the top. Also, when you move an item in the layering order, other items move out of the order that you put them into. So for instance, I move a face item on top of another face item and at the same moment, my foreground layer jumps behind my background layer even though I was not moving it. This makes it functionally impossible to layer items the way you want to.

Edit: Also, where the items appear on the list often do not match where they are actually layered in the image once they begin to jump around.

I am using Firefox.

I´ve got the same problem. ;_;

Layering has been iffy since the v3.5 first went into testing tbh. I'm still having issues with items jumping around as you re-layer things too

I'm surprised that it was rolled out officially if this issue was already known. Hopefully it gets fixed quickly. I just realized that hovering previews are not working on the Organize Items page. Do you know if this has been reported, before I make another report?

They took hovers off the Organize Items page back in the wardrobe v3 already. I believe it was removed for lag reasons and as far as I know they don't plan to bring them back

I think Keith is well aware of this issue but the problem is that he can't replicate it and thus can't fix it.

Meh. Ok. That makes sorting difficult, but I can understand the reasoning.

Thank you very much for responding! It's great to know that you are aware of it and doing what you can. I guess in the meantime we'll just need to use a different browser when making our HA's. That might be useful for people to know, maybe? Is there any useful info that we can provide you to help you replicate the issue (those of us that are experiencing it that is)?

lol ok I thought I was just going crazy, good to know I am not the only one with the issue

I am seeing this issue as well. I am glad I am not the only one. Thank you for submitting the issue! And thank you for looking into it, Keith!