So right now when you're doing your Battle Quests if you use the "Skip Opponent" button to skip your opponent it just pulls a new random one with all the possible people still in the equation. Is there anyway to make the skip opponent button remove the person you're actually skipping from the equation?

I spent this entire week skipping Saggitarius only to get Saggitarius once again, which I feel kind of defeats the purpose, especially since we are only allowed 2 max, so it's not like we can continually skip until we get that one specific opponent to get us through an entire section of levels.

Yes, please do so. Sometimes I use skips to be more likely to get a specific opponent (such as, for example, a challenger I want to write a guide for), and it gets especially annoying when I get the same challenger again. Heck, there are some people who can fight anyone BUT that one challenger.

Yes pleaseee. Would be so much better!

ugh yes please if I skip someone I don't want to get the exact same challenger again. That's the point of skipping them. also voting for removal of general error from the impossible category. throw sophie and deadroot in there instead.

Yeah, skips are a pretty crappy GA perk when they have a chance of being completely worthless. I'm all for this!

Yes, please x100! I had a GA for a while when the quests were first released and got Saggitarius three times in a row one day, which was absurd and made the perk completely useless. I can defeat almost all of the Extremely Hard opponents, but just don't have the right weapon set to take him (or Sandragon) down yet... getting them several times in a row means a loss of several thousand exp for me.

I don't know if it would be possible (even if it was just for GA users), but the "skip" option could/should take the chosen opponent out of the queue for the day. It would make having two skips a HUGE advantage for GA users, which would probably make the people who payed for a GA (specifically for extra quests before the revamp) a lot happier.

Voted yes! Currently there's only one challenger I can't beat reliably, Blue Ball, and I don't want to get him a second time.

I doubt theyll ever put cash shop only opponents into the bq rotation, tbh D: But yeah, I hate that GE isin the last tier =w=

I'm all for this suggestion tho c:

Here for this, it really doesn't make a great perk if you keep getting the same thing.

whoops sometimes I forget who come from where orz in that case maybe it's time for some more free impossible challengers. or make GE start dropping IMP tokens in bqs if he wants to keep gatecrashing the last 5 levels. u_u

Yes please! I just used both of my skips at level 26 and STILL got general error as a challenger on the third :( My pet is capped, the EXP is useless (Since even when the cap is raised, we won't be able to use what we earn!!) I am only even bothering with these last 5 for the imp tokens and it's super frustrating to keep getting GE here - Please release more imp challengers and get rid of GE from this category!!

Pleeeease, if there's any way to make this possible, it should happen. I'll never forget the time I tried to skip Prodigy, got Prodigy, tried to skip Prodigy again, and got Prodigy again. :I Total waste.

Still hoping this is a thing that could be changed. I got the same opponent three times in a row the other day, and that was so frustrating. What's the point of the feature if it doesn't actually work? One of my skips is from a GA and the extra skip is one of the only uses I have for one, so what's the point of it if it isn't actually useful?

I need this xD It's so frustrating to skip an opponent only to get him again.

I didn't see this board initially, but this should totally be a thing.

Yes, please implement this. I was given the same opponent despite skipping twice IN A ROW. :(

Oh gosh, yes please.

I almost always use both of my skips on General Error and STILL have to fight him two or more times. Take him out or make him give impossible tokens when he's in the last 5.

I'd like a change like this too. Although I'm not sure how it would work.