For example, if you were to cut both of your legs off, would you technically be crotchless? Just wondering. :|

O__O this... wow XD I really have no indea! what brought this up?

no. Don't worry, your crotch would still be there. xD

@.:pyro.pocky:. My friend accidentally tore the legs off of an action figure, and we both wandered whether it still had a crotch or not. [:

yep, still has a crotch. except action men don't anyway, so your arguement was pointless.

still. real people still would. xD

o-o; That was utterly random. I do believe so. Yes.

No, because it wouldn't fit the definition of 'crotch' then.

Don't worry, I think about this kind of thing all the time... ;D

Both yes and no:

Yes in the sense that there'd still be genitalia.

No in the sense that wouldn't be a 'junction' where your body branches (i.e, your legs).

Ok, this topic is sooooo random.

I think half the definition is filled.... so... sort of.........?

I don't regularly think about filling the definitions of those types of words.

O.O WHOA. And.. you couldn't have just asked your parents?? xD