Replies

May 13, 2016 9 years ago
Ipsi
is sweet
User Avatar

Here

This won't go wrong at all!

[Item=Pink Bellflowers]

May 13, 2016 9 years ago
Serena922003
is ZOMBIE LONG TIME
User Avatar

Whoa. Not sure what to make of that.

May 14, 2016 9 years ago
Song_745
is a flower child
User Avatar
Enyah

Quote
Hughes referenced House Bill 2, saying the sprays could be helpful to female students who go to the bathroom and don’t know who else may be coming in.
So, it's all about keeping trans people out of the bathroom of their gender identity. If it was really about protection, it wouldn't have come up alongside the bathroom debate.

May 16, 2016 9 years ago
cockatrice
User Avatar

Ah yes, another bs but what about the children?!?! measure that actually makes kids less safe. Lovely.

May 17, 2016 9 years ago
Lypsyl
is a billionaire
User Avatar
Crotchety

This says to me: "We're willing to do anything - even throw children under the bus - in order to make our hateful, transphobic point."

That law is no way to ensure the safety of children, or anyone else for that matter. Its all about hate and nothing else.

May 19, 2016 9 years ago
xoxo777
is a force to be reckoned with
User Avatar
CauchemarInnocent

While I agree that this law was blatantly instituted to further make a point of embarrassing and demeaning transgendered people; I do think that there are some benefits.

Many high school students walk to/from school or the bus and have plenty of distance and time between their home and school. There are many, many creeps that love to assault and harass under-aged people during this time, as I have experienced this harassment personally during my high school years. If a minor is going to school whilst carrying their pepper spray (which is non-lethal by itself), where are they supposed to put it once on campus?

My argument being, positive results can come from legislation that was passed with an amoral/ulterior undertone.

Please log in to reply to this topic.