Replies

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Wolf_Spirit
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar
Precious Angel

You have a pet already in the resort. You want to book 1 or more in at a later date. Veta has the check all pets in option for GAs. One problem: you can't use it because 1 or more pets are already checked-in. I'd like to see the system disregard the pet(s) already checked in and allow mass check-in for any other pets as it's a real pain to have to check each pet in individually when you're a GA holder.

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Paddy
howls at the moon
User Avatar
Night

I'd be in favour of this - I usually keep my main battle pet in the resort, but every now and then I want to put the others in as well, and it's really annoying to have to take that one pet back out, to be able to use the GA perk of adding them all in. It'd be a lot easier if it automatically ignored those already in the resort and just checked in all the ones that aren't ;)

[font=verdana]
My CW shop ~ forumset by
[/font]

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Flying Ace
Ciannwn
User Avatar
Gwyn ap Nudd

I think this is a great idea.

Quote
Ph&;nglui mglw&;nafh Cthulhu R&;lyeh wgah&;nagl fhtagn
H.P Lovecraft
[tot=Ciannwn]

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Darkrai
is magical
User Avatar
Sucre

Yes please

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Lovingly
User Avatar

Support, even though I don't use the resort as my only pet is my gourmand pet. Its sill to have this as a GA feature, if it cant be used half the time.

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Kevin
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Wuf

I never use this feature but I think this change would be a good improvement.

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Historiography
is a Time Lord
User Avatar
Nein

I check in all my pets at the resort a lot, but if it's a pet that's hindering the process I usually just individually put that pet in though. It't not a big deal to me whether or not this is implemented.

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Wolf_Spirit
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar
Precious Angel

the fact of the matter is that the GA feature is nullified if even 1 pet is in the resort. What's the point of having a feature if you can't use it due to it being unusable because of that one pet? Sort of makes this feature useless.

Jan 12, 2016 10 years ago
Historiography
is a Time Lord
User Avatar
Nein

I'm not dissenting against the usage of or against it personally. I can see how it could be useful, but it's not honestly a feature that is going to make that much of a difference to me regardless of implementation.

Please log in to reply to this topic.