Increase the number of pets per search?
Replies
This is regarding the Adopt R Us! Do you think 15 pets is too low a number to load in the pound? Should it be increased to 30, or even 50?
Mainly species like the ever-popular Kumos (or colours such as Common) faces the problem of not all of the pound Kumos showing up. This means people searching for them don't get to see all of them! (And if you were like me and did not know of this fact until now, you'd probably miss adopting a lovely pet simply because it didn't show up in Search One.)
Thanks to for the lovely suggestion! ^^
Original post
Would it be a problem to view ALL the experiments in the pound under a single search tab?
I'm forgetful (and lazy), so I can't remember all the experiment numbers. I do know they're all different species, but it is easier to look at all of em together!
Also, since experiments are only zappable and there are so few of them, it would save time instead of clicking each experiment one by one to look for them. I do like a few certain types of experiments, so to be able to see them all at one shot would be easier.
I apologise if there is a thread for this!
p r e s a g e .[/font]
Isn't there only a limited number of Pets (15) showing up at a time when you do a search in the pound? Because of it a general search option for Experiments wouldn't help much I'm afraid, it would probably always be faster to just click through the list of Experiments you are aiming for (look their numbers up at SubetaLodge and write them down somewhere) than to do the general search fifty times until you've seen everything.
@ yay
Oooh, I never noticed that's how the pound works because I've never found a species that had that problem. (Should have guessed Kumos would be the best species to test it on!)
You're very very right - I didn't think of Subetalodge (or Neocolours).
On the other hand, would editing the thread to being about changing the nature of the search engine to accommodate more than 15 pets be justified?
p r e s a g e .[/font]
Seeing how Keith currently puts limits to other features (items in shops, items on wishlists) as well I don't have too much hope for a big raise of the bar but you could always try. :3
ahaha I think perhaps up to 30 or even 50 wouldn't be a bad idea. I mean there are only a few hundred pets in the pound, it can't be a huge chunk of it being experiments (or can it?)
On the other (other) hand, I think your Subetalodge idea is probably the best way to solve this, and much faster too! I don't really want to sieve through experiments I'm probably not interested in ;3;
/squishu thank yew c:
p r e s a g e .[/font]