Replies

Apr 5, 2013 13 years ago
Thunderbird
is a Time Lord
User Avatar
Bip

Linked.

Thoughts?


Apr 6, 2013 13 years ago
Nightingale
is sour
User Avatar
Rembrandt

You need to provide a proper link to the article, what you gave is the home page of the website.

Buying Fierce Piercings!

Apr 6, 2013 13 years ago
Historiography
is a Time Lord
User Avatar
Nein

I looked up other random articles on it, and quite frankly I'm getting the impression that this was likely the only way Obama could appease the GOP. Yes, I don't really consider it right,but in general the first programs to go during cuts besides education are always the social ones, and while democrats have always been staunchly against cutting to programs like Medicaid, social, etc... I have a feeling that if he hadn't proposed the cuts the budget itself would have been DOA because Republicans in congress would have blocked it from passing. He was going to have to compromise on some front to get the budget passed, though now I wonder if it even will be passed because while it appeases the republican side I doubt it will appease the dems. Side. In all honesty, I'm just neutral about it as I don't have a strong opinion on either side though.

Apr 6, 2013 13 years ago
Miazaki
is a SUPER USER!!!
User Avatar

Quote
President Barack Obama says his soon-to-be released budget, already criticized by friends and foes, is not his &quot;ideal plan&quot; but offers &quot;tough reforms&quot; for benefit programs and scuttles some tax breaks for the wealthy.</p>
<p>That&;s a mix, he contends, that will provide long-term deficit reduction without harming the economy.
....</p>
<p>&quot;It&;s a compromise I&;m willing to accept in order to move beyond a cycle of short-term, crisis-driven decision-making, and focus on growing our economy and our middle class for the long run,&quot; Obama said.
Sounds like he didn't really want to do it but rock and hard place. Shitty decison tho.

[flower=Miazaki]

Apr 7, 2013 13 years ago
Satis
only has room for one
User Avatar

Here are a link to a few sources that explain the situation:

[Url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/obama-budget_n_3019281.html]Huffington Post[/url] [Url=http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/06/obama-touts-budget-with-balanced-approach/?iref=allsearch]CNN[/url] New York Times And in the interests of a balanced discussion: [Url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/06/obama-proposed-budget-not-my-ideal-plan/]Fox News[/url]

So essentially Obama has compromised by changing the inflation formula for social security payments in relation to cost of living, to enable him to compromise to cut tax breaks for the very wealthy? While certainly it is not ideal, there are not going to be any ideal measures to cost cutting or increased taxation.

There is no possible way to please everyone, and while it is lamentable that older populations who generally have higher medical costs will probably suffer under this new plan, modifications have to be made. Medicare and social security as it is is not financially sustainable. Reforms to the system have to be made, and universal health care is a part of that.

If Obama has to compromise with this to allow for increased taxation of the wealthy, then so be it. People cannot expect that the system can remain the same and expect the deficit to magically right itself.

To also be noted, this plan is conditional upon Republican support for reducing tax cuts for the wealthy.

Please log in to reply to this topic.