Ariel - We're still updating all of the "color" items as well as "lolly", "flavor", "mold", and "parlor". I'll let you know if we catch any more.

[edit]

- The description using "center" was fixed for the "Woodland Tea Party Centrepiece", but not the actual item name.

still uses "fibre" in the description.

I am too lazy to go back through old post. But

Loveable and lovable ?

Loveable is an incorrect spelling but SO many items with that spelling. And they have the other half with the correct spelling of lovable ?

Idk if it had been mentioned. Just noticed it :x

Pinging just to see if you know if its been mentioned or not? ;0;

For the Blaque Deluxe Lip Shine - in addition to the lip shine, it has a big long description with a couple of issues.

Description: The highly skilled and highly creative team who formulate and test-run all of Deluxe Lipshines flavors spent WEEKS deciding whether or not the public was ready for Blaque. It seems their gamble paid off, as Blaque is THE most sought-after shade of Deluxe Lipshine, suggesting that Subetas population has quite a large dark, dreary, and depressed contingent.

test-run probably shouldn't have a dash. Lip shines and Subetas should probably be apostrophe s. Or are you trying to get rid of apostrophes?

[edit] Also noticed that several items have icecream rather than ice cream in their descriptions [item2=Baked Apple Arctic] [item2=Chocolate Striped Top] [item2=Deluxe Banana Split] [item2=Lovely Cherry Soft-Serve] [item2=Lovely Strawberry Soft-Serve] [item2=Neep] [item2=Swirly Caramel and Chocolate Ice Cream Cone] [item2=White Chocolate Poopy Soft Serve]

Regarding "cosy" being changed to "cozy", this item is still misspelled.

@ luck ran into another for space v no space vs , five cws have a space, two don't; my vote and autocorrect's vote is for space p:

one more little one for space v no space vs the hat should have a space

Got the OP updated 😢

[edit] I also changed the title of the thread from "Fix the consistency issues in item names" to "Consistency Issues In Item Names"

this also includes descriptions but I wasn't sure if that'd fit in the title. I was also thinking about shortening it to just "in items" but I didn't want people to think I meant like, the actual item art or something. If you have feedback about the thread title let me know.

I've also noticed some other consistency issues, but it's less to do with the item names and descriptions.

It's about battle items and items that maybe used to be weapons or something but now they're not. I've noticed multiple items that no longer have options to be added to the armory or equipped to pets, and yet they still have tiers listed in their item hovers. I don't have a comprehensive list of all of the items affected, but would it be worth pointing them out on this thread when others or myself come across them?

Or maybe or someone else on staff would be able to go through their own item data and compile a list? I'm not sure how difficult it would be to determine all of the items that are like this.

[edit] A few more actual name inconsistencies.

Fairytale vs Fairy Tale Majority of items on the site use Fairy Tale in the title except for these:

Raygun vs Ray Gun According to Wikipedia, both names are acceptable. But it seems like the majority of items on the site use Raygun except for these:

Found a new one that hasn't been brought up! Shouldn't this be a Graveyard Kanis Plushie?

I got the OP updated now. I also changed the title of the thread from "item names" to "items" and I will add rarity info.

I think if you do happen to run across those types of items it might not hurt to post them here? I'm not sure what exactly can be done for those.. phantom weapons, if anything. But maybe they can get fixed.

Okay here's kind of an example of what I was talking about. Tier 0? What is that all about? And it's not even a weapon, there's no "Move to armory" or "Equip to pet" option for that item.

And then some of these are marked as Tier 0 as well, although they can still be equipped to pets and used in battle (but it's separate from weapons that go into the armory).

Make up vs make-up vs makeup

There are two items with the spelling make up:

There are four items with the spelling make-up:

And the rest are spelled makeup so I'd suggest to change the names of those six items.

Alright! I don't know if all of the items like that are listed as Tier 0 though. Some of those potions are labelled with Tier 1, and then there are the Pylonics which seem to be mostly labelled with Tier 2. Although they can still be equipped to pets, they don't function like the normal weapons either.

This little guy is listed as r150. He was released as a free gift during that infamous September 2011 weekend so he should be an r195, shouldn't he?

I've noticed that some of the redeemable wigs have had their rarities changed back to the Cash Shop rarity instead of the wig rarity. I guess this may have accidentally happened while you guys were fixing the rarities for some of the old Cash Shop items.

It seems like some of the wigs that are currently in the Boutique have the incorrect rarity, and I've also noticed a few that aren't in there currently have the wrong rarity as well.

Examples:

But there are more than just those two.