Replies

Dec 2, 2014 11 years ago
Frusciante
donated to the cash shop
User Avatar

If a user regularly signs up for Mysterious Melody and never sends anything, they shouldn't be allowed to sign up more just to waste the time/items of others who want to actually exchange gifts. When I say ban, I mean just from participating in MM, not from the game, of course.

Dec 2, 2014 11 years ago
Darkrai
is magical
User Avatar
Sucre

I think if this were to be implemented, it should be after multiple offenses to keep it fair. Because sometimes things do come up and if it prevents you from being on the computer for the rest of the day, that sucks but it's no reason to keep them from participating in Mysterious Melody again.

The only problem with banning people who don't send anything is that people who do this already just to get gifts will start sending only junk items to their MMs so that they won't get banned.

All in all, I think there are far too many people participating just so they can get things themselves, including some of those who do send gifts out.

Dec 2, 2014 11 years ago
Andrew
is the richest user
User Avatar
Kyy

Iits a good idea in principle, this might just mean that people who dont usually send things will just start sending slot sporks or junk. Then we'll have the same issue again, "ban MMs who send junk."

It's like the wishing shrub. It's a great concept, and many people DO love to send things out. But as usual, many will abuse the system. Or indirectly, like those who bought up commonly requested shrub items and set them at at higher prices, etc.

[tot=Andrew] | [egg=Andrew] | [tp=Andrew] >> Wishlist <<

Dec 2, 2014 11 years ago
JESSYTA
is the richest user
User Avatar

Every year people make similar suggestions to this. Every year people think that they will get back what they put into MM. They don't. But people continue to participate willingly.

If you are going to participate in MM, you should remember the saying... Tis better to give than to receive.

Dec 2, 2014 11 years ago
Balloon
is full of hot air
User Avatar
Vulcanusmon

Yeah, I don't think the banning would do much good. Today I have a partner who's only sent one gift, but it doesn't bother me. If they don't respond again, I just won't send them anything else... it's not like you're forced to keep sending them stuff. And I like sending gifts anyway, so I'm doing it for the fun of it. I don't expect to get anything priceless; it's just fun to get surprises and find cool stuff to send out.

Dec 3, 2014 11 years ago
Kelcifer
is adrift
User Avatar
Sakurayashiki

I'd much rather have my mm send me a slots spork then nothing at all. At least they actually did something rather than just signing up and not participating.

Dec 3, 2014 11 years ago
usagi
has some electric moves!
User Avatar
Josie

I totally agree with this suggestion! :) It doesn't take long to get partnered up for MM, so I don't see no time as an excuse? :l It just comes across as needy by saying hey I wasn't busy enough to click the non-obligatory join button yet I'm too busy to send anything the rest of the day. It isn't fair to the other person at all.

[sup]"We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives inside the dream."[/sup] [sup]art by [/sup] [sup]cute gallery[/sup]

Dec 3, 2014 11 years ago
Nobody puts
Cream
in a corner
User Avatar

Seems like this would be for those who care more about getting things so they can benefit,No thanks.


CW Release Shop [Url=https://subeta.net/user_shops.php/shop/24352/category/CW+For+Sale] Cw's for sale from my wardrobe[/url]

Dec 3, 2014 11 years ago
Zabrie
is stuffed with fluff
User Avatar
Denizci

I like this idea. I don't mind if I send my MM more valuable stuff than s/he sends me (in fact, that is likely). I am irritated when I am sent nothing though.

Dec 3, 2014 11 years ago
marvel
ships it
User Avatar
Cutethulhu

I don't really participate in MM because I find it too stressful, but yeah, it would be nice if there was a way to weed out the people who don't gift (repeatedly, like Darkrai said) and/or the people who send junk items and nothing else.

idk. It's just hard to keep people from abusing the system to get free stuff, which is sad.

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
girlikecupcake
wants to believe
User Avatar
Liron

Could there be a standard definition of what "junk" is? That's an issue I'm seeing.

I think if a user signs up and doesn't send anything at -all- for, say, a total of three days, ban 'em from MM. But we all sign up willingly to -give- gifts. There's always a risk that we'll get nothing in return. I've got a daily budget for MM, so I'm sending stuff out regardless of whether I get stuff.

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

I personally think that this should implemented.

I also believe that anyone bitching about how little they get should also be banned

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
Elsa
is a foodie
User Avatar

The problem is that people will start sending small, like 2 SP items so that they won't be banned.

We all sign up at our own discretion. It's too bad that some people are only in it for the receiving, but there's no way for us to control it. However - we could advertise the fact that it's only fun to be in MM if you give. Something like a message on the MM page, for example.

❄️ Seeking Elsa or Olaf inspired CWs ❄️

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago Official
Keith
is sweet
User Avatar
Eradication

I'm working on some ways to make giving easier and I also think a few prods during the day ("Hey, you haven't sent a gift to your mysterious melody yet!") via events might go a long way too.

💖 ✨ 🤗

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
Eivor
has a dragon
User Avatar
MacLachlan

Banning seems exceptionally harsh and won't make anyone want to participate because hey, if something comes up and you were in the MM for that day, you're crap out of luck. Right?

I'd be more for a reminder halfway through the day and another towards midnight when the cron's refreshed, beyond that is too extreme.

[size=6pt][sub][ he/they | aroace/nb ][/sub]

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
FENNEC
is on cloud nine
User Avatar

Keith PLEASE don't do the alerts! It will get annoying and People will probably choose to ignore it. I don't want that crap spamming my event box over some mm person who chooses to ignore the alerts and still sends nothing.

It would be nice if the items to give stopped moving about everytime you send something(I would like this!)

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
toxic
does not get outside
User Avatar

and if we could send more than one item at a time.

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
FENNEC
is on cloud nine
User Avatar

Quote by MAR
Undoubtedly and if we could send more than one item at a time.
Very true<3

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
Tigtorres
has fire in their soul
User Avatar
Ducks

Nice idea


[Flower=Tigtorres]

Dec 4, 2014 11 years ago
Dice
is unlucky
User Avatar

Might a better solution be to set it up so that if a user signs up for MM and sends nothing, they're locked out from entering the day after, but can enter again the day after. Alerts aren't going to do anything; there's no real element of repercussions to them. The fact that Keith even suggested alerts indicates that lack of gifting is detectable, and that something can be done. Of course this might lead to gifts of single junk items, but I'd rather have junk than nothing.



Please log in to reply to this topic.