Yes pleeeeaaaaase. Mass remove (check boxes please !), and hover names (like when you go to a pets page, you can see the name when hovering an item). I am going to be switching beanbags out of Booty's tc and into Luga's. This is going to be Hell.

pls 10000% support TCs are kind of a pain as they are rn

Yes please.

My TCs are ever growing

Hi. I have a million duplicates in a pet treasure. (read 50+) and being able to sort by either name or Item ID would be massively helpful when trying to remove duplicates. Please? Pretty please?

We need a TC revamp! Please. c:

I know nothing about code and my computer expertise is pretty much limited to the power switch. But, fwiw, I personally have no trouble with limits on sort options. Maybe limit the ability to sort by page but allow us to highlight & move multiple items forward or backward a page? If there were direction arrows at the top of each page and we could R-click or something to highlight all the items we want to move to a page < or >. Even with limitations, it would still be better than what we have now.

It would be great if the limit was 50 or 100 items at a time, it's fine if that doesn't happen but I agree with the limit idea overall.

The limit would probably start off at about 25, because it's best to start small! But we may then increase it based on what we observe with the usage. This page probably won't be used super often, so we may be able to increase it a lot over time :)

Stupid question: how many users/pets have tcs with a thousand items or more?

Another stupid question: If things were paginated, why would the feature not be available to users with lager pet tcs? Doesn't pagination solve the lag issue with large tcs? (Is my ignorance showing?)

For your first question: more than you'd think, and either way, those users matter to us even if they're not the majority.

Pagination would only solve the issue of displaying the items - as it would only display a certain number at a time. However, sorting needs to involve all the items no matter how they are displayed. If I ask you to sort 3000 numbers, you have to look at all 3000 of them to sort them correctly, you can't really sort like 500 at a time while ignoring the rest. Does that make sense?

Thanks for the explanation. :) It does make sense. I had actually assumed that it was only sorting by page and not all of the items instead of the way you describe.

Personally I'm against pagnation for sorting tcs. for removal that would be fine. just my opinion tho :) (because flight rising does that and it annoys the crap out of me when i have to go through multiple pages to move a dragon.) I assumed any kind of mass remove would have a limit, it only makes sense :)

Hmm.. brainstorming ways to sort? What about check-boxes next to the rows that are already there, once checked it selects the whole row? Or maybe put selectable check boxes by all of them and have it (like the battle front page?) where once checked it moves the items into another box which you can then mass remove from and have that box have a limit of like 40 or something. (Just throwing that number out there) gives people a chance to preview what they're removing and if the box could stay on multiple pages it could be used for a pagnation type of page.

i'm illiterate when it comes to this stuff, but re: sorting (by id, rarity, etc)... how is it different from sorting the vault or user shops? shops might be limited now, but vaults aren't.

I don't have any ideas for a way to auto sort feasible with large TCs, but I just wanted to say how much I appreciate staff taking those of us with massive TCs into account. It would definitely be very upsetting to be cut out of certain features for loving TCs too much.

As for pagination/limits/etc on a mass removal feature, that sounds fine. Anything would be better than what we have now. As long as TC organization doesn't get paginated (which would make it very hard/impossible to do certain types of large TCs) having it for removals wouldn't be that big a deal.