Replies

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Comfort_265
User Avatar

Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked Longtime Member! Celebrate another year with Subeta! Unlocked First Year!! Wow, you've been around for a year! As a thanks for playing, here is a one week gold account medal!

Oh wow lol I just got 6 loyalty boxes o.0 Thanks

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Mike
is unlucky
User Avatar
Piety

I love to know the various statistics of the site, so I definitely don't support this.

Someone's OCD and someone else's lack of commitment isn't a very good reasoning either. It's entirely possible to make billions of sP without ever spending a dime IRL, and even easier if you have a few dollars to spare every few months. That being said, there's always going to be someone better than you (unless you're the absolute best, and only one person can be...)

Besides which the personal ranking is a great way of knowing the actual distribution of sP and subsequently the value of rare items, as some have already said. I check that page frequently as my sP fluctuates just to know how many people have how many hundreds of millions.

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Flying Ace
Speiro
User Avatar

Removing rankings won't do anything of value for the site. If anything encourages sP hoarding, it's bank interest. I can't think of any other games (aside from Neopets) that actively reward players for keeping massive amounts of currency.

I'm raking in just over 100k a day just for logging in. It's kind of silly when you think about it, but it's way too late to get rid of it.


Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Seerow
is the richest user
User Avatar
Sweetgrass Voice

I would be very disappointed if the rankings went away. As others have brought up before it's a good general gauge of where the market is. If that was gone (or had never existed in the first place) it would be hard to tell your place in the market. Are you the lowly fry cook or Bill Gates of Subeta?

That said I do have the achievement and so this wouldn't directly affect me.

Quote by insane

Subeta is mostly made of individual activities, you shine alone, you die alone. It&;s a great feat to be able to put X number of people that barely know each other together and synchronise them into achieving something together. That was the really fun part of it. Pooling for the richest user was a great human experience and for once, players got to team up and figure out how to do something together.
I was part of the group that pooled our sp together to get that achievement and it was an amazing experience. Getting together with people that I didn't know other than seeing them around on the forums and getting a chance to talk with everyone was great. Sure it's nerve wracking to lend your billions to the pile, but they are also trusting you in return. Plus you all get to experience the stomach-churning fear of accidentally withdrawing too much sp and deleting it all. That's fun :P

If you really want the achievement find some friends (or make new ones!) to pool sp. There are 87 people that have over 2.2bil, it shouldn't be hard to get a pool going. Plus they got rid of that max-sp-out-at-a-time limit so you can't accidentally delete it all.

Headshot by

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Balloon
is full of hot air
User Avatar
Vulcanusmon

You are the 11,166th richest user on Subeta.

Pffft. The ranking doesn't bother me because I know I'll never get there. I like buying stuff too much XD Honestly, I forget about the ranking unless I see someone with the "is the richest user" forum title. It's not an achievement that matters to me, but then I'm sure the balloon-related achievements don't matter to other people like they do to me ;)

Quote by Speiro
I&;m raking in just over 100k a day just for logging in. It&;s kind of silly when you think about it, but it&;s way too late to get rid of it.

Didn't Scarsdale or somebody say the Morty Cards were supposed to expire after a month... like months ago? And that the daily interest boost was supposed to go away after one day? In other words, it seems like someone on staff said they had fixed the problems with the interest boosts, but I'm still getting the boosts months later.

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Darkrai
is magical
User Avatar
Sucre

Yeah the boosts were supposedly fixed, but they weren't. The Morty Card counter on the Buffs page actually counts up instead of down, and the 24-hour boost still just doesn't expire as far as I know.

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Flying Ace
Speiro
User Avatar

I don't think Morty Cards are even given out anymore? I thought they abandoned the whole project and just silently moved on.


Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Dice
is unlucky
User Avatar

Quote by Hiccup
It does encourage hoarding and on a side note, I&;m fairly OCD about having a specific amount in the richest user rank and I then don&;t spend sP that I could spend because I don&;t like my rank dropping.

Yup, that's me to a T. Lot of people assume this is some obsession with the achievement. It isn't; I know I'll never get it, not by my own devices or by pooling funds (I'd never risk it - one may have worked, but there was at least another attempt which collapsed, right?). I wouldn't even use the forum title if I had it. It's more seeing where I currently am now as an achievement in itself.

Quote by InSaNe
I think this suggestion thread is mostly about removing the ranking, not the achievement itself.

If it were up to me, the whole thing would go; ranking disappears, and the achievement is retired. It still changes nothing. If you made it to richest user, you still get the achievement marked as complete and you still keep your forum title. The site still acknowledges that you did it.

Sure, hoarders gonna hoard. There are probably some hoarders who care about as much as their ranking as those who spend all their sp as soon as they get it, but there are enough people who are quietly (or otherwise) affected by their ranking. It provides an extra incentive, and we don't need it.

I do agree that the ranking has a unifying effect. It's very helpful to know where you are in terms of the economy as a whole rather than drifting blindly through the site wondering is Xsp is a lot. It sort of ties us together as a community.

Comprommise: replace the specific rankings with a percentage point (using integers only). You still get a sense of the economy, and of being part of something, but it removes the brunt of the pressure which comes with individual rankings. Also, the top number comes much lower down the economic scale; if a user wants to get to the top 1% for funsies, then they only have to amass about 250 million sp (by current rates).



Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
poppet
User Avatar

Is it possible to get rid of or replace that text with custom CSS and would that be a sufficient fix? It seems like this is just a personal issue for something that has an actual use on the site.

Jul 8, 2015 10 years ago
Dice
is unlucky
User Avatar

Hiding it from myself won't help. It'll still be there. This isn't an exclusively personal issue, though. I've been mulling this over for months, thinking about it from a site-wide perspective, and I honestly think that removing or altering the ranking will be a step towards improving the site's economy. It certainly won't make it worse. I only added my perspective for context.

Quote by poppet
something that has an actual use on the site.

...does it though? I don't know why it was implemented in the first place, but any effects the ranking might have on the site seem to be largely secondary. The ranking itself does nothing.



Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Survivor
is a DANCING QUEEN
User Avatar

Nothing on this site has an actual use. You collect beanbags or sP or achievements or wearables. At the end of the day they don't actually do anything. But it's satisfying to set goals and achieve them. Or finally finish that collection that you've worked on for months. I don't see how richest user rank is any different.

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
InSaNe
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Hydragellos

Plus, you have this backwards. Removing a harmless feature wouldn't solve anything. People will be prone to hoarding for as long as we will allow them to have infinite amounts of sP.

Limiting how much sP one can have would be going back to the dark times of Subeta though, it's a less than liberal approach to say the least.

Your signature is 913 px wide by 77 px tall. Please note this can be affected by CustomCSS if you have any.

(Because text affects the width of your signature, we suggest testing with all text removed to be sure your width is correct.)

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Dice
is unlucky
User Avatar

Quote by Survivor
Nothing on this site has an actual use. You collect beanbags or sP or achievements or wearables. At the end of the day they don&;t actually do anything. But it&;s satisfying to set goals and achieve them. Or finally finish that collection that you&;ve worked on for months. I don&;t see how richest user rank is any different.

I'm not sure that's a fair comparison. You can actually interact with items on site, and collections act as a sink; you can achieve things with little to no lasting economic effect. Also, isn't it better for people to set goals on how much money they actually have/want/need, rather than aiming to reach an abstract and ever shifting rank for the sake of it?

Quote by InSaNe
Plus, you have this backwards. Removing a harmless feature wouldn&;t solve anything. People will be prone to hoarding for as long as we will allow them to have infinite amounts of sP.</p>
<p>Limiting how much sP one can have would be going back to the dark times of Subeta though, it&;s a less than liberal approach to say the least.

This could go both ways. If it's so harmless, why not remove it anyway? It still acts as an incentive to hoard for some people, and it may be only a minor change, but it's one in the right direction. The fewer incentives, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant, the better. Who ever said anything about limiting sp? Have as much as you please, I just don't think it should be measured in a site-wide ranking.



Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Survivor
is a DANCING QUEEN
User Avatar

What economic effect are you trying to achieve? Subeta has been creating so many sP sinks to remove sP from the economy. Therefore increasing the value of sP. If you have someone hoarding 36 billion sP that they have no intentions of spending, is that not just as good? Why is hoarding sP so bad?

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Dice
is unlucky
User Avatar

The more sp in the system, the less value it has. Hoarded sp doesn't get sunk back. Moreover, the incentive to reach a certain rank results in more sp being generated in relation to the sp which is removed. It's not as much the retention, but the increasing creation of sp which is the issue. It's trying to manage that fine line between playing subeta to be fun but also somewhat worthwhile. Acquiring sp is a large part of the fun, but in essence, the more you produce, the less value it has.

I don't imagine for a second that the removal of the ranking will have an earth-shattering or even really noticeable effect on the economy, but it's better than nothing.



Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Seerow
is the richest user
User Avatar
Sweetgrass Voice

Removing a ranking isn't going to change the habits of people though, other then to annoy those users who actually use the number, people who like to know the general state of the economy and such. If that is removed we have no way to gauge that really.

Whether we keep it or not, people who hoard are still going to hoard. In practice, people who hoard massive piles and never spend or have any inclination to spend sp are just as effective as a sink really. If that number never leaves the account then it has no buying power. To be fair though that does make it harder to tell how much sp is currently actually in circulation.

In all I haven't seen a good argument to having the ranking erased other than some people not wanting to go below a certain number and other people upset they will never reach a certain number. If that's how they chose to play the game and it makes them unhappy maybe they should just stop looking at the rankings. It's not like it's in your face or anything and you have to look at it everyday.

Headshot by

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Andrew
is the richest user
User Avatar
Kyy

Quote by Dice
I don&;t imagine for a second that the removal of the ranking will have an earth-shattering or even really noticeable effect on the economy
Well, there you have it. If it's not going to make a difference, why bother.

I can understand where you are coming from. But you are overgeneralizing.

Quote by dice
Moreover, the incentive to reach a certain rank results in more sp being generated in relation to the sp which is removed.
This is a vague statement. In essence, youre saying that people want to be richer (though somehow it's tied to wanting a better rank). But even then, how can you explicitly tie the two together. Everyone wants to make sp, no? Everyone wants to be richer, with or without a ranking, there's no exception.

Also, If i have 5bil, and then 500bil gets removed from the system. Why would i not just wait it out and have my 5bil be worth 7bil? I know it's coming. Antique shop items wont get cheaper, but market items will.

[tot=Andrew] | [egg=Andrew] | [tp=Andrew] >> Wishlist <<

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
far
is a gold digger
User Avatar
Fartsie

If users do not wish to spend their sP, they will not do it. Even if you create 750 type of sP sinks and retire the "Richest User", it will not make a difference. You cannot force people to spend if they are not willing to do so. I have the goal to be a millionaire in real life. Will it happens? Who knows. I love seeing my sP and I love to set new goals. While I don't spend much, I still have a decent account. Some people like to hoard, some not. Some have other interest and everyone is different. If sP is not a concern, then the current ranking is not important to them. I fail to see the issue here. It's just a virtual number with virtual praise.

[font=arial]But you don't belong to the shadows[/font]

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
errant
is stuffed with fluff
User Avatar
Nos Coeur

Quote by Lyn
SP is just another thing here that some people collect. You shouldn&;t let it frustrate you. You see people with all kinds of wearables, plushies, beanbags, or awesome battle pets. Those are just other things people collect. You should just see it that way and not let it frustrate you.
I agree with this at the end of the day. I saw the commas in 's bank and quickly decided I wouldn't be the richest user any time soon, but I'd rather spend sP on plushies, my gourmand pet, etc.

[Center]❤ Happy Lumi ❤[/center]

Jul 9, 2015 10 years ago
Andrew
is the richest user
User Avatar
Kyy

hahah i guess as a side note, that the picture was a joke. i dont actually have that much sp. :/

[tot=Andrew] | [egg=Andrew] | [tp=Andrew] >> Wishlist <<

Please log in to reply to this topic.