SPEAK FRIEND AND ENTER
let us carry on our discussion from yesterday, or just gush about hobbity things. also here is a link to an incomplete/in-progress overview of my modern AU, for anyone interested in knowing more! feel free to ask me any questions you may have, or offer any suggestions -- I'm glad to have finally found people interested in talking about it with me! ;u;
also PLEASE ping anyone you think would be interested in joining the group!

I don't know what to gush about or whine about first. let's start with desolation of smaug. while the kill scene,etc, was all pretty intense, it ended wayyy to quickly imo. I was hoping for a bit more action/struggle, idk. thoughts?
[ToT=Capricornus] Biting for Blistered Hearts, Boobitis, Brain Rot, Bubble Jelly, Butterfly Bruise, Clusterflux, Hive Mind, Love Bug, Muerte Fuerte, Pinkie Patch & Virus.
so many feels
: did the art and I made the forum image uwu
: are you talking about Smaug's death scene?
: more FÃli yes good, and poor Beorn was so glossed over that I wanted to scream (though the Extended of DoS did have them coming out to meet him in pairs, it was glorious uwu) however, I really enjoyed the way Thorin's gold sickness was executed, omg it was so involved and I loved it.
yes, I am.
[ToT=Capricornus] Biting for Blistered Hearts, Boobitis, Brain Rot, Bubble Jelly, Butterfly Bruise, Clusterflux, Hive Mind, Love Bug, Muerte Fuerte, Pinkie Patch & Virus.
: I felt like it was anticlimactic and short, would've liked to see more.
The real disappointment was the lack of back and forth between Bilbo and Smaug (and Bilbo being a TERRIBLE thief. who walks into a known dragon lair and yells 'HELLO'/whatever he yelled? YOU'RE FIRED, BILBO).
The riddles back and forth between them in the book were legitimately my favourite bits of the ENTIRE book. While they did have some in the film and I got to appreciate Smaug's beautiful facial structure and subtle detailing/movements it wasn't enough. Especially when what we were given instead was...a chase scene. A chase scene that ended in a BEDAZZLED DRAGON AND THE WORST CGI GOLD I'VE SEEN SINCE THE EARLY 90s.
Bilbo using Underhill as his name during the riddles at the VERY LEAST would have been nice. There are so many tiny things that are references to LOTR and all they went with instead of showing the eye over and over. But the lack of ramp up and back and forth between the two took away any and all of Smaug's character. He because just a dragon. Just another dragon that was taken down in the most illogical fashion I have EVER SEEN.
I have lots of feelings about The Hobbit and these...'movies'. The entire trilogy, outside of maybe 2 or 3 scenes had no soul or feeling. The things that brought me back to see them in theatres wasn't the story that I love, but the tiny things like certain characters and seeing how things would be portrayed on screen...which disappointed me so, so much. By the third movie I went to see how absurd it would be...since by the end of the second I was just sitting there like 'are they even trying?'. 8c
: omg I completely agree, I felt cheated by the exchange between Smaug and Bilbo, it was not what I pictured when I read the book. NOT AT ALL. Smaug was so lovely and well-done in the beginning but everything disintegrated the further the movie progressed ._. tbh I love the movies, but they started out great and ended up...not good. I have such love for the characters and felt the movies ended up doing a disservice to them. (particularly dear FÃli and my namesake, omg poor tauriel.)
yeh ultimately the movies just...stopped caring before they even started. I wasn't surprised tho. There is legitimately not as much care for this trilogy as the first one, and it shows. The first Hobbit movie was 'great' cause of the introduction and lack of an attempt at hollywood-level action (although it still went with the 'THEY'RE GETTING CHASED!' trope, which isn't needed for The Hobbit). Every scene that would have been a calm, settle down after action moment was turned into absurdity in an attempt to keep people invested (when instead it completely detached me). The MAIN SCENE I'm referencing that had this approach was the barrel scene. It was absurd, it was slapstick, it was unnecessary. Legolas being added was unecesarry and brought in plot that just...why. Why was there a love triangle. and I loved Tauriel but she was legit added JUST for romantic tension (despite the actress NOT WANTING THAT and being PROMISED that wouldn't happen).
It's tropey hollywood bullshit instead of a true, loving book to film adaptation. The battle for 'SPENT THE MOST AND GOT THE MOST' with movies is really killing their quality. Nevermind that they were rushed (ridiculously so. the behind the scenes shows them doing what should be early editing work THE NIGHT BEFORE DEADLINES) you could see the exhaustion and detachment from the subject matter in the crew. Even if people cared and loved what they were working on they weren't able to direct that appreciation anywhere. And that sucks? Cause now that we have this trilogy no one is going to touch it again. So we're stuck with this let down of a trilogy. :c
I lost myself there, sorry. I just...guh. The Hobbit movies make me sad. And not in the way the LOTR trilogy good (aka, the good, weeping because I FEEL THINGS sad).
ALSO like...95% of the films were made up. I understand altering a story for a movie is needed for time reasons but that isn't what they did. They LEGITIMATELY MADE SHIT UP AND CHANGED SO MUCH. in a BAD WAY.
(the first movie was good because andy serkis was an assistant/creative director. he had other projects he had to leave for during the others. he was that last bit of hope for them and he brought a lot to the first...especially Riddles in the Dark...oh goodness that scene)
Basically is my go-to hobbit/LOTR buddy.
A lot of what she said I totally agree with.
This is how I feel. Like the pale orc situation? was a thing but he died AGES BEFORE THE HOBBIT. LIKE. WHY MAKE HIM SUCH A THING IN THE MOVIES WE ALREADY HAVE A BIG BAD AND IT'S A DRAGON COME ON. I liked the idea of tauriel but they didn't do much with her? She started off strong and then .... lol. Just so many things were good in theory but didn't work out well. Or it was just batshit and relied on CGI. God the 'LETS MELT THE DRAGON WITH GOLD' and he literally shakes it off like it aint no thang like alfskdjlaksjflkjf.
: omg I know right? like I understand that not adding Legolas would fuck with the timeline PJ has created but his role was WAY TOO BIG, especially with the slaying of Bolg WHICH I WANTED FILI AND KILI TO DO
and Tauriel is my queen and I love her relationship with KÃli but I didn't want that to be the definition of her character, and it was and I am so mad about it ;n; I hope Evangeline is too because she did such a great job with what she was given and she wanted Tauriel to be so much more than just a love interest, like you said.
There were so many fallacies and I have so much anger and so much love. The first movie was GREAT. hell, even the second movie was pretty good. But the third...it started out with such promise. :c BUT I STILL HAVE FEELINGS, those characters made me feel things and I am trash.
Loving characters with all your heart makes viciously critiquing and tearing apart bad adaptations of them even better, if you ask me!
: omg I just
I wanted so much better for FÃli and KÃli, they got THE SHAFT in the last movie. all the action that should have belonged to them defending their fallen uncle was given to an elf who had no dog in that fight (except 'omg he made me bleed my own blood', which is a shit reason in my book)
and Tauriel, oh god, don't even get me started on her, poor thing started out lonely and ended up committing assisted suicide
thanks PJ for giving me characters to love and destroying their story.
Yeah, I think one of the favorite things about the books is how Fili and Kili died. They died trying to save their uncle. It was very honorable, and dwarves are all about that (like look at how important braids and beards are to them). Instead Fili gets killed without getting any sort of fight in (he was the heir he should have gotten SO MUCH MORE BACKGROUND AND JUSTL AKJSDFLKAJDSLKFJ) and then Kili died trying to go help Tauriel and just. SKLFDJSLDKFJ.
Pie and I were talking the other day about how the differences between book thorin and movie thorin throw us off. like he's so sassy in the books and great and in the movie it's all brood. Like I said in SB, I think they casted really well for most of the people (go away bilbo/martin freeman). I think richard armitage did well with what he was given just ugh I WANTED SO MUCH MORE FOR HIM TOO.
: I KNOW RIGHT? I justified them dying as dying honourably, and that didn't happen, especially on FÃli's part. I was so ready to watch them go down fighting for their uncle, and I knew Tauriel would be involved in KÃli's death somehow...but I got completely screwed over.
also omg yes, I expected much more sass from Thorin. Richard was GREAT (I seriously have no complaints about casting AT ALL and I think Richard was the perfect Thorin), but the writing didn't do him justice at all. He was majestic, but he wasn't the Thorin I wanted to see.
I'm so glad I'm not the only person with these feelings ;u;
Yeah richard was great. He does great interviews for it and his behind the scenes stuff is hilarious. Really, all the dwarves were great. I just wish he had better writing because ugh he would have nailed it (FILI TOO HE COULD HAVE BEEN GREAT).
Am I ready to watch the movie? Am I?
who knows