Replies

Mar 4, 2017 9 years ago
ache
is a quitter
User Avatar

I have a handful of pets that do indeed have CWs in their treasure. The items were very fitting for them. Maybe a few I could do without. Maybe. But the characters that the pets are based on are very near and dear to me, so I don't regret having spent the funds on them.

I look at it this way - if I'm willing to spend 300M for a single item for one pet, then why shouldn't I spend ~75M on another item for another pet?

Mar 4, 2017 9 years ago
Luck
is unlucky
User Avatar
Bella

For the longest time, I completely ignored CWs in terms of pet treasure. And I mostly still do. For things like, the sheer cost of it, and the very real possibility of simply not being able to have an item (private). For me I think it's better to just pretend CWs don't exist when working on treasure.

However, I did manage to fall down the slippery slope of putting CWs in one pet treasure, because at the time, there weren't many of that themed CW, so I thought it was doable. Well, basically, I guess the theme got popular because more and more were made. It became more than I ever expected or could handle so I kinda lost my wind on collecting it... xD'

he/him / 31 / EST



My best friend is



Mar 4, 2017 9 years ago
Sophie
is going batty
User Avatar
Eviaren

Quote by Hylian
No, too expensive.

Agreed. I hardly have any CWs in the wardrobe.

[flower=Sophie]

Mar 4, 2017 9 years ago
Pirate
has been EXTERMINATED
User Avatar
Spite

I have. No idea how many, no idea where exactly because I am clearly turning senile. Why? I like CWs, I love my Pets and it's worth it for me. C:

Please log in to reply to this topic.