Replies

Jul 25, 2015 10 years ago
Nedera
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar

It is going to take forever to put almost 3000 items in my collections. It's ridiculous to not have a "move to ___ collection" button.

Jul 25, 2015 10 years ago
Kevin
is all-powerful
User Avatar
Wuf

this won't ever happen, staff shoots it down every time. collections take a lot of work, you can just do it bit by bit though, do 10 items at a time and move onto something else, then another 10 items later :P

Jul 25, 2015 10 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

Why did you wait until you had 3000 items before putting them in a collection?

Jul 25, 2015 10 years ago
marvel
ships it
User Avatar
Cutethulhu

Quote by Sopheroo
Why did you wait until you had 3000 items before putting them in a collection?
I used to hoard my plushies before the collection got alphabetized so I could add them in big alphabetized chunks...maybe they were just late to the party?

Jul 25, 2015 10 years ago
Tefibi
has ALL of the things!
User Avatar
Jawsy

Hey, if I had to do it everyone else should have the opportunity to enjoy the tediousness for themselves. Muahahahahaha!

Totally kidding. :) I really wouldn't mind this at all, even though staff has previously said no. I did mine as I got them but went on a big buying spree over a couple recent months to boost my collections a ton, and it really does get incredibly monotonous (even if you do them a bit at a time). Though I get where staff is coming from on this point too. It would take some of the effort out of completing collections.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
The Royal
raichu_466
User Avatar
Minyu

They should make something similar like the Hustler with stickers, where you pay an small fee to be able to add an item to your collection with just one click. It makes lazy people who don't mind spending a few million happy and it's an sp sink. EVERYBODY'S HAPPY :D


dA • tumblr • cw comms

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

Quote by raichu
They should make something similar like the Hustler with stickers, where you pay an small fee to be able to add an item to your collection with just one click. It makes lazy people who don&;t mind spending a few million happy and it&;s an sp sink. EVERYBODY&;S HAPPY :D

The difference with stickers is that with stickers, you didn't have a choice to rely on other people. You did have a choice to put your plushies in your collection when you bought them, you just procrastinated.

I can support this for features where there are risks to be scammed, but there was zero risks with plushies.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
The Royal
raichu_466
User Avatar
Minyu

I understand that, but I still think it isn't a bad idea. The "collections are supposed to be hard to get" excuse seems silly when the actual effort is getting the items, not putting them in your collection. The effort of adding them one by one feels like an extra hassle that doesn't add anything.

You could say that when you start with collections there're a lot of cheap items that are super easy to get, and the effort then is adding them to collections. But those are mostly newer users who probably wouldn't use the feature anyways if it has an small fee (seeing how much people didn't like the idea of paying 10k for stickers).


dA • tumblr • cw comms

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Nedera
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar

I just bought them. I bought 400 or so beanbags and plushies that I was putting in as I won from vending and such. But I just got serious about collecting and bought items. It'a not about lazyness or procrastination. A lot of time is spent buying and sorting. Not really sure how it hurts to have a button. And if someone is willing to spend sp like someone suggested that would be a plus. I would be willing to do it probably. Like I said I don't have the time to put 3000+ items in hand by hand. And even doing it gradually is beyond annoying so I'm just selling what I bought.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

Ten times as much as stickers and I'm game. Stickers should have been that high, but they decided to add the random stickers, which counterbalance the low fee.

But I wouldn't want the feature to be much less than 100K/plushie

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
The Royal
raichu_466
User Avatar
Minyu

I'm fine with that :P Considering how much some rare plushies cost, 100k doesn't sound as a bad deal.


dA • tumblr • cw comms

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Nedera
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar

That's a little steep but I would be willing to do 50k per item.There's three collections and over 6k items between them. 100k per would a billion sp. Which is more than a sink.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

If it's too steep, you have the option to do it for free, it won't be removed.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Nedera
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar

Let's not forget this is HYPOTHETICAL.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Darkrai
is magical
User Avatar
Sucre

Yeah, but this got moved into suggestions now. So if you don't actually want to suggest this, ask for it to be locked since the point of the suggestions forum is to suggest things to be added to the site

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Marlboro
loves dinosaurs
User Avatar
PsychoDreamer

The "add X to collection" after you buy from the SS is enough. Collections are a game, a very difficult one and it's on purpose, so I don't see any reason to make it easier.

Open 10 tabs at a time and add them, you are lucky because now you don't have the option to play with a pet, so it's even less scrolling and thinking..

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Nedera
is forever on a quest for more pets
User Avatar

I'm not the one who moved it to suggestions. It would be really cool but it seems like it's already been rejected as an idea.

Not sure why people are so butthurt over this. It hurts you zero if it were to ever be implemented.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
WHIMZY
is very punny
User Avatar
Wyath

There was another thread recently here. And for quoting who quoted the FAQ :

Quote
collections are supposed to be tedious and having a QS option would make it too easy to work on these collections, as well as cluttering the QS page.

~ One thousand and one yellow daffodils
Begin to dance in front of you...oh dear.

♥ / ♫

My selling thread, clickie.

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Klassikal
brought home the bacon
User Avatar
Subolo

Oh no, the 'you are butt hurt' play. Quite the unique and bold strategy.

it doesn't seem like OP wants thos open as a suggestion, not sure if you're allowed to lock it.

[Img]http://i.imgur.com/UvICXV0.jpg?1[/img]
Adorable Creation by
Flowers For Me?

Jul 26, 2015 10 years ago
Sopheroo
pitched a tent
User Avatar
Hyacinthe

Quote
Not sure why people are so butthurt over this. It hurts you zero if it were to ever be implemented.

Because the way it works now is fine, unless you neglected to put them in your collection after buying them. You have an inventory limit of 250 with a GA (100 without) which is not so bad

Please log in to reply to this topic.