Replies

Dec 28, 2014 11 years ago
Rainey
scratched a gambling itch
User Avatar
Clesis

Great idea!

Dec 29, 2014 11 years ago
Austria
needs a vacation!
User Avatar
Erasure

I think this is a good idea, if it's possible to do.

Dec 30, 2014 11 years ago
jpan1995
is shady
User Avatar

Yes! I agree. There should be a direct trade option, to eliminate all the res trades, because those get EXTREMELY ANNOYING

Dec 30, 2014 11 years ago
Nori
has a sweet tooth
User Avatar

Came back to this post and yes to filtering out CWs! :)

Dec 30, 2014 11 years ago
usagi
has some electric moves!
User Avatar
Josie

Yes, please. We could definitely use some filters (reserved, cw) for trades. Going through them now is a hassle.

[sup]"We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives inside the dream."[/sup] [sup]art by [/sup] [sup]cute gallery[/sup]

Dec 30, 2014 11 years ago
HYPEBEAST
is cooler than cool
User Avatar

This would be really helpful. Sometimes people don't even bother writing 'reserved' or anything, which is pretty annoying when offering on those trades.

* BUYING! *

Dec 30, 2014 11 years ago
dainty
howls at the moon
User Avatar
Wolfie

Yessss. I support this.

Jan 5, 2015 11 years ago
Before you die, you see
ThatScienceTeacher
User Avatar
Agape

I like the CW filtering idea you all have too, as long as there's also and option to view the CWs (for people who are actually looking for them).

Non-Binary/Genderqueer - Any Pronouns [tot=thatscienceteacher]

Jan 15, 2015 11 years ago
Don't toy with
helloeevee
User Avatar

Yes! I can't think of any downside to this. This is a great idea.

Jan 15, 2015 11 years ago
Shantal
is a skilled hooker
User Avatar

Yes please! I support this.

Jan 15, 2015 11 years ago
Zelor
is lonely
User Avatar

I would like this to be a thing too.

Jan 15, 2015 11 years ago
Rocketlauncher
beat the meat!
User Avatar

I would be OK with an optional filter for searching. It's good for those who couldn't be bothered looked at reserved lots, while giving others the option to look at all the lots for info (like how many were up and changed hands, and their suggested prices).

I'm more peeved at trades that have no description. Sometimes it's reserved, offer, best bid, or ask first. It's a great way to make it harder and slower for both the buyer and seller. I wish it's not an option to leave it blank.

Jan 16, 2015 11 years ago
Don't toy with
helloeevee
User Avatar

That bothers me a lot, too. Maybe they could add checkboxes for those things, too? And what kinds of things they'd consider accepting, if it's not reserved? Like items, sp, CSC... And maybe make it mandatory to check at least one box, so people looking at the lots at least have some sort of information? I don't know, that might not be the best idea, or easy to implement, but I thought I'd share it anyway.

Jan 17, 2015 11 years ago
Gray
is shady
User Avatar

I like this idea. Most of the time viewing trade lots is pretty useless since people have them either as reserved or can't be bothered to say what they want for the item.

Jan 19, 2015 11 years ago
iciness
is a Time Lord
User Avatar

I fully support this! Being able to filter trades for both private/reserved items as well as CWs would be fantastic.

❄ [tot=iciness] ❄

Please log in to reply to this topic.