Replies

May 19, 2009 16 years ago
Mieke
is the richest user
User Avatar

It's hard enough to go through hundreds of yearbook photos to make sure no one's flipping the camera off. If you have to inspect everyones crotch for shadows too, they'll never get out.

Hasn't anyone ever heard of taking responsibility for your actions?

And also.. what kind of school has thousands of dollars to pay for all new yearbooks? And you KNOW not everyone will take the new ones, so the picture'll still be out there. It's done with. Play it off as a shadow, and move on. And then don't be so stupid in the future.

May 19, 2009 16 years ago
auteur
gets around
User Avatar

She's a dumbass for not wearing underwear, i mean come on. :/ But it is terribly embarrassing, so i think they should just recall the ones they've put out and get rid of the picture. Probably wouldnt get them all but it'd reduce the likeliness of the picture being spread around.

May 19, 2009 16 years ago
ROCK
is a gem
User Avatar

I just came to say , not only is it illegal to distribute ANY picture of ANYone under 18 nude or anything, it is a Federal offense. The people responsible/distributing the yearbooks would be (if charged) sexual offenders for the rest of their lives. :(

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Psychedelia
loves dinosaurs
User Avatar

Well she's an idiot and I don't feel sorry for her one bit. Guess the school will get hit with distributing indecent pictures and face a lawsuit but, really it's her own damn fault for being an idiot and not wearing at least a fucking thing ferchrissake.

Good. i HOPE this haunts her. Maybe next time she'll act like a lady instead of a trashy whore in front of a camera.

collecting

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Taylor
is a tomb raider
User Avatar

That girl and her mother are both idiots. The girl could have at least closed her legs more if she knew she was going to take a picture with a dress on and no underwear. :| And her mother is just plain stupid for not making her go to school. That's not going to improve her grades or anything, that's making the school year worse.

Imo, she got what she deserved. She didn't want to wear underwear so she gets faced with the consequences. Next time she won't dress like a little slut.

[flower=Taylor]

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Psychedelia
loves dinosaurs
User Avatar

Acting LIKE a whore. Which, imo, she was acting like a whore.

collecting

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Taylor
is a tomb raider
User Avatar

Quote by FuryFromAbove
We don&;t even know this girl, why judge her as a "whore"?

Going to school with no underwear, a very short dress, and not closing/crossing her legs when a picture is being taken; that doesn't sound like a whore to you?

[flower=Taylor]

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Taylor
is a tomb raider
User Avatar

I like how you avoided my question. ;)

And to answer your questions, no. But those questions don't really matter. The point is that she acted in a slutty manner. That's my opinion. You can have your opinion. I'm not going to start this big debate over whether she's a whore or not.

[flower=Taylor]

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
The Royal
xjx
User Avatar

lol, well i can see how that could be overlooked. depending on where youre from, yearbooks can cost up to $90 with a shitload of pages, so it can be easily overlooked on accident. i had a class in high school where all we did was work on the yearbook for the entire year, and we almost sent in two separate pages where some girls underwear was fully visible.

and god, i cant believe how high and mighty the mother is acting and how theyre blaming the school. first of all, the girl was so stupid to go commando in such a short dress (one that wasnt even tight, not that she couldnt have worn a thong anyway), know that she was going to have a photo taken sitting down and facing forward, and choosing to sit in the front row without even trying to hide it. i mean, come on. how stupid can you be?

i would be pissed as fuck if they took away all the yearbooks so we wouldnt have them until months after school is over. the reason why they give them out before school is done is to have your friends sign them. that would make a ton of people angry, not to mention how much money would be lost. that would just be punishment for everyone because of that one girls mistake. i find it ironic that she and her mother are the ones that are placing the blame.

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Saturnine
wants to believe
User Avatar
Fearleading

Quote by Spring
That girl and her mother are both idiots. The girl could have at least closed her legs more if she knew she was going to take a picture with a dress on and no underwear. :| And her mother is just plain stupid for not making her go to school. That&;s not going to improve her grades or anything, that&;s making the school year worse.</p>
<p>Imo, she got what she deserved. She didn&;t want to wear underwear so she gets faced with the consequences. Next time she won&;t dress like a little slut.

Quoted for Truth.

S-F
[flower=saturnine][tot=Saturnine]

May 20, 2009 16 years ago
Kaitlyn
is ZOMBIE LONG TIME
User Avatar

How stupid of the girl. =/

I was head of the yearbook staff my senior year in high school and I can understand why something like that might get overlooked by the staff. You have to go through every picture of every student to make sure their names are spelled correctly and everything that honestly it's easy to skip over something.

Really all they have to do is call up the distributor and order so many stickers of a touched-up version of the picture or just an entirely different picture all together and manually place them in each of the books that were ordered. We had to do that with a picture that ended up getting half way cut-off the page and it worked just fine. Saves a whole lot of money and a head-ache. :3

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
moedeath
User Avatar

no big no big, we seen lilo's we can see anotha teen ho's

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Isabella
is a DANCING QUEEN
User Avatar

Quote by ivyatoms
no big no big, we seen lilo&;s we can see anotha teen ho&;s
LOL. No, but the idiot made her poor life decision, and now she can face the consequences.

art by

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
moedeath
User Avatar

bella, i agree... KINDA

i don't think not wearing panties is really a /poor life decision/

that just seems too intense.... sometimes i don't wear undies.

BUT I KEEP MAH BIZZNEZ 2 MAHSELF

so yeah, just a mistake! cover it up with a gold star in the yearbooks! BLiNg BaBy

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Knoxville_744
User Avatar

Quote by Obscene
</p>
<p>Who the hell is gonna care about your panty-line? It&;s better than being known as the girl who left her vajayjay open in a picture.

Oh goodness, that made me laugh. xD

On a more serious note, yes, she was stupid to wear that short of a dress with no underwear to school...BUT the school should stop giving out those yearbooks! Unless they are looking for a lawsuit.

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Skiller
User Avatar

Oh, sucks for the girl.

Sure, I would never wear a short dress without any kind of underwear, but I think some of you guys are going waaay over board by calling her a whore. Didn't the OP say that she was on, or walking up stairs? Yeah, you can't cross your legs while doing that, unless you want to look like a dumbass.

With the yearbooks, I think they should re print them. Maybe they can recycle the old yearbooks and use that?XD It'd help. And wouldn't publishing the picture sort of be... oh I don't know, against the law? Yaaaay for photographing a minors vagina.:/

[IMG]http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w81/xXW_olfPackXx/1186112402998.gif[/IMG]

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Sultry
is a billionaire
User Avatar

slutslutslutslutslut

I have zero sympathy for her AT ALL.

And her mother is worse than she is. What kind of a parent allows her 16 year old daughter to parade around in no underwear, let alone at SCHOOL!

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Scarsdale
User Avatar

Whore.

First of all, that dress is ugly. Second of all, who doesn't wear underwear? Better yet, who doesn't wear underwear when wearing a dress?

I'm sure the ho purposely did not wear panties for the picture.

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Mieke
is the richest user
User Avatar

Quote by xXWolfPackXx
Didn&;t the OP say that she was on, or walking up stairs? Yeah, you can&;t cross your legs while doing that, unless you want to look like a dumbass.</p>
<p>

No, if you looked at the link, or at any of the other stuff, it was a straight on picture where she was sitting. She could have crossed her legs.

May 21, 2009 16 years ago
Skiller
User Avatar

Quote by Mieke
No, if you looked at the link, or at any of the other stuff, it was a straight on picture where she was sitting. She could have crossed her legs.

I tried looking at the link in fact, two times the video wasn't about anything like her so...:/

Were her legs like, real far apart too? If so then, yeah that's her fault. When I wear dresses I either cross my legs or keep them real close together, so it is mostly her fault, I guess.

[IMG]http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w81/xXW_olfPackXx/1186112402998.gif[/IMG]

Please log in to reply to this topic.